All DevCenters
MSDN Home
Windows Live ID
MSDN Archive:   MSDN Archive Home   |   Browse Archive   |   Share Code   |   Help and FAQs

Home
Discussions
Issue Tracker
People
License
 
Discussions List | Create New Discussion
1-10 of 59 < Previous Next >
Discussions for Visual Studio Language Futures for C# and Visual Basic
Latest post:
Mar 30
3:14 AM
12 Posts
First post: francois_tanguay wrote: There should be a way to extend static class with additional static methods. One example I stumbled upon was using the Assert class. I wanted to add new assertion methods. It could look...
Latest post: Bronx wrote: +1 vote for this feature. Rationale: 1) for static classes: static classes are essentially just namespaces for a set of logically linked functions and inner classes. We can easily exte...
Jump to: First Post    |Latest Post Tags: C#
Latest post:
Mar 28
8:01 AM
59 Posts
First post: CharlieCalvert wrote: Please enter your comments on the Call Hieararchy feature here.
Latest post: sherlock84 wrote: My opinions about this feature are as following: 1. I agree with the idea that the Call Hierarchy should be displayed in a dockable window. This feature just provides a reference, a quic...
Jump to: First Post    |Latest Post Tags: Call Hierarchy, C#, Visual Basic
Latest post:
Aug 17 2011
34 Posts
First post: JonTsao wrote: Please enter your feedback on Document Map Margin here.
Latest post: dkrueger wrote: Any word on when this will be available? I really miss Rock Scroll. Thanks!
Jump to: First Post    |Latest Post
Latest post:
Sep 18 2009
8 Posts
First post: eusebiu wrote: Wouldn't be nice if C# had a optional keyword for the methods/properties in an interface? interface IMyInterface { optional void OptionalMethod(); void NotOptionalMethod(); } public ...
Latest post: JamesCurran wrote: Wait a minute, I forgot that OptionalMethod, if implemented could throw an exception, which we don't want to lose. IMyInterface obj = GetAnIMyInterfaceObject(); obj.NotOptionalMethod(); ...
Jump to: First Post    |Latest Post Tags: C#
Latest post:
Jun 13 2009
2 Posts
First post: JamesThomas wrote: I was working on some class structures over the past couple of days and it occurred to me that it would be extremely nice if a member class could directly impact the parent without the ne...
Latest post: danielearwicker wrote: This is basically the same thing as inner classes in Java, also known as non-static nested classes. The compiler automatically adds a reference to the outer class, and ensures that it is ...
Jump to: First Post    |Latest Post Tags: C#
Latest post:
May 19 2009
47 Posts
First post: MichaelGG wrote: So much suspense... Will C# 4 have native tuple support? So we can finally do stuff like: var wt, iot = ThreadPool.GetMinThreads() And stop having to resort to out parameters or custom ...
Latest post: rendle wrote: Wow. Loads of Tuples. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd383325(VS.100).aspx No syntactic sugar, but never mind.
Jump to: First Post    |Latest Post Tags: C#
Latest post:
Feb 9 2009
1 Post
First post: Sharas wrote: Hi, Not sure this is the right place, but I would like to know will proper aspect oriented programming be supported in c# v4? By proper I mean unintrusive AOP with pointcuts separately d...
Jump to: First Post Tags: C#
Latest post:
Dec 10 2008
2 Posts
First post: JeremyAtGosub wrote: One of my pet peeves is having to use a cast to convert between simple types, like this: int i = (int)(Math.sin(a)*100); I propose we do two things that will make the code easier to rea...
Latest post: JeremyAtGosub wrote: A better way to implement this (without adding new constructors to the built in types) is to have the compiler use conversion operators as well as constructors: int i = int(Math.sin(a)*1...
Jump to: First Post    |Latest Post
Latest post:
Dec 4 2008
4 Posts
First post: Coder wrote: I would love to have the Design-by-Contract features of Spec# (http://research.microsoft.com/SpecSharp/) in mainstream C#, and the Boogie verifier built in to Visual Studio. Things...
Latest post: Coder wrote: I saw that, and was greatly pleased. It's going to make our testing cycle even more fun.
Jump to: First Post    |Latest Post Tags: C#
Latest post:
Nov 17 2008
3 Posts
First post: JeremyAtGosub wrote: I don't like the "using" syntax for automatically disposing a local object because it forces you to create a new scope. I'd like to tell the compiler to dispose the object at the end of ...
Latest post: danielearwicker wrote: I think this would be a great idea and not at all hard to implement. I've long argued for using to be allowed as a modifier on members in a class (fields or properties), causing the conta...
Jump to: First Post    |Latest Post Tags: C#

Configure View

Sorted by Latest post
Search
Filter
(by tag)
All tags
C#
Call Hierarchy
Visual Basic
1-10 of 59 < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >
Show 10 25 50 All discussions
Updating...
Page view tracker